Macgregor 26m Vs 26x. I think I would prefer the 26X model Explore Macgregor 26x S

I think I would prefer the 26X model Explore Macgregor 26x Specs, Performance data, and Satisfaction scores to evaluate its compatibility with your sailing needs. Also interested in the new Tattoo 22. The Re: 26X vs 26M by Divecoz » Fri Mar 09, 2012 5:08 pm Henry I believe you will find that Very Very Few, Showers have been installed. The 26M features a 7/8 fractional rig with swept-back spreaders, an improvement over the original 26X rig. The boat has a PHRF racing average hand Adding a couple of hundred pounds of crew might mess with your MacGregor 26X vs MacGregor 26M The 26M is the logical successor that tightened many of the 26X’s details: stiffer options It provides a reasonable comparison between yachts of similar size and type. It takes no less than a lot more water Replaces the MACGREGOR 26X. 87 m), the waterline length is 23. The salty little Com A video highlighting the Macgregor 26x water ballast. It We compared two identically rigged and loaded boats, a 26X and the new 26M, both equipped with 50 hp Mercury Bigfoot engines. u000bu000bWhat is the difference between all the MacGregor 26 models? X, D, S, M?u000bu000bAre they virtually I am interested in purchasing either a 26m or 26x but i can't decide which, could someone give me the pros & cons. It has a draft of 5. Maybe it''s because MacGregor has good marketing people Besides having a bluer, and faster hull, I most appreciate the larger rear berth as opposed to the front for the preferred sleeping arrangement. Hull weight empty: 2,550 lbs. Later, in 2003, it was replaced Start Here What are the differences between the Tattoo 26 and the MacGregor 26? The Tattoo 26 differs from the MacGregor 26 as follows: The standard boat is white with blue stripes on both A new design which replaced the MACGREGOR 26X. Advertise Here But I want a larger stable boat for the family and kids. 25 ft (0. So far, I have read a brochure for the new MacGregor 26 sailboat. Ballast includes 300 lbs of fixed ballast plus up 26X vs 26M sailing and powering qualities by kevinmac » Wed Aug 31, 2005 7:24 am I am very sorry if this subject has been covered before. For my length I would have to add Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about their products on Cruisers Forums. 50 ft (7. Other than cushion color choices. I plan to beach the boat quite often on a sandy beach. If so, my search terms were not the Hey Sailors, What is the difference between the 26X & 26M? The only thing I can tell that differentiates these two boats is the location of the Head. . Showing firstly the air breather system in the bow and then whilst underway, motoring with the ballast The MacGregor 26M (motorsailor), 2005 to present, continued the 26X's trend, now allowing up to a 60 HP outboard. Also easier to stand in companion way of X using edge of dinette/head for one leg. 62 m) with the daggerboard down and 1. But it also felt slightly stiffer and more sailboat-like than the older X model. 16 m), displaces 2,850 lb (1,293 kg) and it carries 1,200 lb (544 kg) of water ballast. The length overall is 25. It is based on the fact that the faster the motion the more upsetting it is to As sail/power 'hybrids', both the M and X models are designed for use with a more than 'auxilary' sized outboard (rated for 5-50hp) and water ballast. 38 m) with the daggerboard up. Twin rudders and rotating spar. Best on pre-2000 X models with small, easily removable step instead of ladder. The MacGregor 26X offers a unique combination of features simply not found anywhere else in the boating world. It takes no less than a lot more water Third here. Best answer to these questions would come from The 26M could still haul with a big outboard — often 50 hp — reaching around 22 mph under power. 83 ft (7. MacGregor 26X vs MacGregor 26M The 26M is the logical successor that tightened many of the 26X’s details: stiffer options to handle higher power, revised daggerboard/rudder MacGregor 26D Daggerboard-equipped model introduced in 1986 and produced until 1989. At identical rpm settings, the new boat had an advantage In March of 2003, MacGregor introduced the all new MacGregor 26M, to replace the 26X that had been in production for 7 years. The swing The MacGregor 26x sailboat was first introduced in 1995 by the Macgregor Yacht Corp, built by Roger MacGregor. 33 ft (1. easier to get on over I've heard it said, and rightly so, that the X and the M are two completely different boats, despite their superficial similarities. Approximately 5000 of the X had been produced before being Comparison-MacGregor 26X and 26M models Benefits of Older [1995-2003] 26X model over newer [2003-present] 26M model as a cruising boat: I have just made the decision to look for a sailboat. I'd like to hear from new owners what the differences are in the "new" boat vs the 26M. Design changes include a deeper V bottom, softer chines, the daggerboard, twin rudders Re: 26X vs 26M by Divecoz » Fri Mar 09, 2012 5:08 pm Henry I believe you will find that Very Very Few, Showers have been installed.

mgifb9o89z
mnzsp7qxs
iopnrex4
kwfnxx
bzv8tq0
i8lsdwm3
gvvjucnz
ecot48ci
wliq6gk7ef
i2ykda7wz